Tuesday, October 20, 2009

Beaufort

This movie is one that I thought helped me better understand what Israeli military go through. It is hard for me to say how much different this is than what American armies go through, but I would assume that many of the feelings and fear are similar. Basically the only characters in this movie are those in the bunker and we never really see any enemy around them. It is focused solely on what the lives for these soldiers in this bunker are going through. An interesting fact is that the director, Joseph Cedar, was once in the same IDF group as these young men. Once I found this out it helped to validate that what we were seeing with these men and the fears they had were real and honestly what people went through in this situation. Once of the most interesting aspects of the movie was how these men seemed as though they were prisoners within the walls of the Beaufort castle. It didn't seem as though they had any control of situation, even what went on within these walls. It seemed to me that these men never thought that the war was going to end, and even if it did, they wouldn't realize it because we got the illusion that they were trapped inside these walls. They were constantly afraid that the enemy was going to attack and we always saw the men going through the hallways, never without their army gear and never without fear that a shot would be fired and the war would continue. After watching the movie, and finding out that the director himself had gone through in the war himself, I wanted to see if the actors had gone through war as well, and what basis this story had in terms of reality.

I found that many of the actors had not actually been in combat, and many people had problems with that because they would not accurately be able to portray what happens in war. The director, "Cedar commented that the actors had to spend a month at an actual outpost preparing for their roles" and becoming acquainted with how these soldiers had to live. This may seem crazy to us because actors in America are seen as rich people who have everything handed to them and live a glorified life. It seemed strange to me that people in Israel would expect an actor in a movie to have actual been in war, because in America this generally would not happen. One of the biggest things that I found frustrating was the fact that we never really got any idea from the enemy as to what was going on. Obviously, the men in the bunker were going to be scared and afraid that an attack would happen, but we never quite figure out what is going to happen or how everything is going to be carried out. It would have been nice to see both sides to the war, but still focusing mainly on what the Israeli side was going through. In all I thought this was a good movie and enjoyed learning about what soldiers go through in times like these. I think it was a good portrayal of a soldiers life and their fear for war.

5 comments:

  1. This sounds like an excellent movie.. I was not able to watch it, but your post helps me see a glimpse of it! That is fascinating that they made the actors go through experiences in war before filming! That would seem to give much more authenticity and authority to the film!

    ReplyDelete
  2. I think the fact that the viewer is left in the dark in regard to the "other side" of the conflict reflects the fact that many of the soldiers in Beaufort only have a vague idea of what they're fighting against. Thanks for the extra info on the production of the film. It was very interesting.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I think the uproar the actors' lack of military service caused in Israel is interesting. It makes me wonder if there would have been any difference in the film or not. Also, I agree with Katie, that the "other" was not shown in order to illustrate how little contact the soldiers have with the people they are fighting against aside from bombs.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I think Katie is right about why the Lebanese are not shown in the film. Also, I think if they were shown, they may have been villafied; I'm glad that this film focused solely on the soldiers in the bunker. Had the film shown the other side, the viewer might feel like they would have to pick a side.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I think there are SO MANY unknowns in any way, and like Katie mentioned, I think the fact that they didn't show the other side kind of drew the viewer's attention to these many unknowns.

    Also, very interesting about the actors and the controversy it caused. No body seemed to think any less of Ben Affleck or Josh Hartnett for not having actually fought in Pearl Harbor... just a thought. :-P

    ReplyDelete